donald trump

US and UK agree to begin talks on removing steel tariffs  

The United States has agreed to begin talks seeking to remove the tariffs on British steel and aluminium imposed by former president Donald Trump.

Trump Soft-Launches His 2024 Campaign  

FLORENCE, Ariz.—Tonight, deep in the Arizona desert, thousands of people chanted for Donald Trump. They had braved the wind for hours—some waited the entire day—just to get a glimpse of the defeated former president. And when he finally appeared on stage, as Lee Greenwood played from the loudspeakers, the crowd roared as though Trump were still the commander in chief. To many of them, he is.

“I ran twice and we won twice,” Trump told his fans. “This crowd is a massive symbol of what took place, because people are hungry for the truth. They want their country back.”

Tonight’s rally was Trump’s first public event since July. On paper, the gathering was meant as his response to the anniversary of January 6, as well as an unofficial kickoff for his efforts to support Republicans in the midterm elections. But the event also served as the soft launch of Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. Although he didn’t say the words, the former president seems poised to run in two years—“Make America great again againagain,” he joked to the crowd—and tonight, his message was as clear as it was dishonest: He didn’t lose to Joe Biden in 2020, and he’ll spend the next year working to elect Republicans who agree.

[Read: Trump’s next coup has already begun]

Trump chose Arizona for this moment for a reason. In this state, the Big Lie thrives. Trump lost Arizona by only 10,000 votes in 2020, giving him and his supporters the space, apparently, to allege that the close outcome was the result of left-wing chicanery, the result of ballot stuffing and interference by Venezuelans, among other false claims. State lawmakers who spent the past year reviewing the ballots ultimately found zero evidence of mischief. But that didn’t matter to Trump’s supporters. GOP politicians across Arizona adopted Trump’s lies anyway. Many of them were guests of honor tonight.

The pre-Trump headliner was Kari Lake, the former TV-news reporter running to replace Governor Doug Ducey; she alleges, falsely, that “bag loads of ballots” were dumped in Arizona last year. (“Kari Lake, she’s been with us from the beginning on the election fraud,” Trump gushed when he brought her back on stage for a cameo during his speech.) Other speakers included secretary-of-state candidate Mark Finchem, who was at the Capitol last January 6 and who often wears a cowboy hat and bolo tie despite being from Michigan; Paul Gosar, Andy Biggs, and Debbie Lesko, three Trump-loving members of Congress who voted against certifying Biden’s win in 2020; and Arizona GOP chair Kelli Ward, who has embraced numerous conspiracy theories and recently received a cease-and-desist notice from Dominion Voting Systems after accusing the company of changing 6,000 Trump votes to Biden votes. Each of these Republicans has repeatedly echoed Trump’s false allegations of election mischief. Of course they have. This is the former president’s new litmus test: You endorse the lie; he endorses you.

Nearly everyone I interviewed at the rally vowed to follow Trump’s lead and support only GOP candidates who endorse the false idea that he won the election. “I watched all those Republican candidates in Arizona right now covering it up,” Julie Stohldrier, who drove in with her sister, Amy, told me. “They’re all talk and no action.” Lake is promising action, so the sisters adore her. The pair would love for Trump to run again in 2024, but they don’t think he will, and they’re not sure he’ll need to: They’re confident that he’ll be reinstated as president sometime soon, after Arizona and other states vote to decertify the election. “I want Trump back now,” Amy told me. “I can’t do another three years of this.”

The Stohldriers’ predictions might seem bold, but the sisters were simply echoing what they’d been hearing from prominent Republicans at the rally. Earlier that afternoon, Ward, the state party chair, had warmed up the crowd by promising that the 2020 election results would soon be overturned. By the latter half of the night, Lake was calling for the arrests of anyone involved in the “shady, shoddy election of 2020.”

[Adam Serwer: Democrats will have to do more to save democracy from Trump]

Everything we know about fundamentals of midterm elections suggests that Republicans will have an excellent 2022. If Lake and the other Big Lie proponents at tonight’s rally can win their primary races, they’ve got a good shot at becoming the Grand Canyon State’s next generation of political leaders. Even with power, though, they’ll still owe Trump a debt of loyalty—one that he’ll expect to be repaid. “Kari will be incredible for election integrity,” Trump said of Lake, just after vowing to turn on her if she didn’t do “a great job.” Election integrity, he added, might be Lake’s “No. 1 issue.”

An hour or so into his speech, Trump turned his attention to January 6, calling the storming of the Capitol an excuse for Democrats to arrest people and abuse them in jail. He mocked the police officer who shot Ashli Babbitt, and the crowd cheered. He suggested that the FBI planted people in the crowd outside the Capitol to incite the riot. “The real insurrection took place on Election Day, November 3,” he added.

Trump has been broadcasting these messages for more than a year now. The difference is, what he says hasn’t quite permeated the public consciousness the same way it once did. Trump is no longer the president, and he’s been permanently banned from Twitter, which means that his accusations of fraud and tirades against insufficiently loyal Republicans have had to be expressed via emailed press releases. In this way, the former president has been off the grid.

Trump has still been speaking directly to his most dutiful supporters through far-right media outlets, though. (“He’s tan, fit, has lost some weight since he left office,” Newsmax’s anchors, speculating eagerly about a 2024 announcement, trilled as Trump took the stage here. “People forget that The Apprentice was the No. 1 show on NBC.”) Now that the midterm season is fully under way, Trump will be out and about more often, hosting rallies and stumping for any Republicans desperate enough to lie about the election in exchange for his support. He will in some ways be reintroducing himself to the country: Here I am, America, back after a stolen election, ready to win by any means possible.

I asked a group of older attendees if they were excited to see Trump run again in 2024. They all were. Two of them argued about whether he could take office before 2025. “It’s not possible,” a retiree named Michael, who declined to give his last name, said. “I think it is!” a retiree named Susan Higgins said. “The military has to come in and take [Biden] away.”

By the end of the evening, Trump was having trouble pretending that he wasn’t actively running for president. He previewed his lines of attack on Biden over Afghanistan, immigration, and inflation; recited a litany of policy changes that a Republican-controlled Congress would be able to make; and promised that “in 2024, we are going to take back the White House.” Sam and Dave’s “Hold on I’m Coming” played as he exited, and the song sounded like a promise.

Trump has had a remarkable 14 months. Most losing presidential candidates are forced into quiet retirement by their parties. Trump has bucked the trend, only tightening his grip on the GOP in the wake of his defeat. He has convinced Republican candidates all over the country—including those on stage tonight—to repeat his election lies, and convinced his rank-and-file supporters to treat those falsehoods as holy writ. By this point, those lies have been circulating for what feels like forever. But at tonight’s rally, as Trump’s fans called for the arrests of poll workers and the reinstatement of the rightful president, I got the sense that this might be just the beginning.

What America Lost by Delaying the Vaccine Rollout   -13%

The first COVID-19 vaccine could arrive before Election Day, Donald Trump avowed in the summer of 2020. But government regulators wanted things to work out differently: “The deep state, or whoever, over at the FDA is making it very difficult for drug companies to get people in order to test the vaccines and therapeutics,” he wrote on Twitter. “Obviously, they are hoping to delay the answer until after November 3rd.”

Regulators did, in fact, end up slowing the process: In the first week of September, the FDA told vaccine makers to extend their clinical trials by several weeks beyond what they’d planned, in order to gather more safety data. That effectively postponed Pfizer’s request for an emergency use authorization of the mRNA vaccine it had developed with BioNTech until after the election. The agency had been under attack from both sides: The president had wanted regulators to move more quickly, while an alarmed public-health community was pushing for the opposite. In the end, the decision to slow things down was meant to bolster the country’s waning confidence in the forthcoming COVID-19 vaccines and restore the FDA’s reputation for integrity and caution. But the move looks very different in hindsight, with full knowledge of the safety and efficacy of the vaccines and of the body count that amassed shortly after. The economist Garett Jones recently opined that Trump’s scuttled hopes to release a COVID-19 vaccine a few weeks earlier “likely would have saved at least 100,000 American lives.”

Could Jones be correct about the human scale of this decision? His colleague at George Mason University, the libertarian economist and blogger Alex Tabarrok, often writes about the “invisible graveyard”: the final resting place for all those killed by the FDA’s bureaucratic foot-dragging. Indeed, one of the more painful lessons we’ve learned about governance during this pandemic is that waiting for more data can be a leading cause of death. But just how deadly was the government’s choice to slow down Pfizer’s and Moderna’s research in the fall of 2020?

Let’s recall the context for the FDA’s decision. During the first year of the pandemic, it was easy to freak out a little bit as the president pushed wishful but unproven COVID-19 therapies along the FDA’s high-speed pathway for emergency use authorization (EUA). In particular, hydroxychloroquine and convalescent plasma were touted as miracle cures and widely distributed to patients even in the absence of convincing data showing that they worked.

As the election approached that fall, and Trump intensified his attacks on the agency, those two messy episodes set the stage for a bigger regulatory standoff. The stakes had seemed much lower for the “miracle cures” because those were typically being given to people already sick with COVID. The new mRNA injections, if authorized, would be delivered to millions of healthy, uninfected Americans, most of whom were unlikely ever to develop severe disease. “We don’t do EUAs for vaccines,” the pediatrician and vaccinologist Peter Hotez told Yahoo News on September 1. “It’s a lesser review, it’s a lower-quality review, and when you’re talking about vaccinating a large chunk of the American population, that’s not acceptable.”

The FDA had already signaled that it would make the EUA process more demanding for the COVID-19 vaccines than it had been for medical products in the past: The vaccine makers would need to show results from a large-scale Phase 3 clinical trial. Pfizer initially expected to have these by the end of October, when its 44,000-person clinical trial would have accrued enough data points for researchers to perform a first statistical analysis. Then the FDA applied the brakes, telling Pfizer and Moderna that it wanted additional safety data. More specifically, it wanted the companies to have tracked the health of at least half of their clinical-trial subjects for 60 days following the second dose. The thinking was that most adverse reactions occur within the first 42 days of vaccination, but out of an abundance of caution, the FDA would extend that period to 60 days, which was still much shorter than the six months of follow-up expected for a full vaccine approval.

[Read: The FDA really did have to take this long]

FDA scientists touted this new proposal as “EUA Plus.” Marion Gruber, a former head of the agency’s vaccine office, told me it was not a direct response to the president’s actions. “We tried to separate ourselves from whatever politics was going on,” she said when I interviewed her last year. Nevertheless, she was concerned that the public’s confidence in the vaccines was on the decline that fall. Gallup poll numbers indicate that Americans’ willingness to take an approved COVID-19 vaccine had dipped from 66 percent that summer to just 50 percent in September.

Fearful that the FDA bureaucrats could be overruled by the White House, outside scientists locked arms and sent a letter to Pfizer’s CEO, Albert Bourla, on September 25, telling him that the proposed safety delay would be crucial for securing “the utmost trust in the vaccine and the science behind it.” They warned that a “premature application would prolong the pandemic” and “severely damage” Pfizer’s reputation.

In the end, Pfizer did not reveal its trial’s favorable results until November 9—six days after the election. The company had originally planned to consider submitting an EUA request to the FDA with just 32 data points; instead it gathered 94, and it waited another 11 days to accrue the requested safety data, plus even more data showing how well the vaccine worked, before making its filing. With no serious safety issues and vaccine efficacy coming out in the mid-90s, outsiders were more than satisfied. So was the FDA, which finally granted Pfizer’s vaccine an EUA on December 11.

The claim that the delay killed 100,000 people assumes that the process got backed up by six to eight weeks, and that the vaccine could have been rolling out by the end of October. Having reported a book on the COVID-19 vaccine race, I find this imagined timeline unrealistic. The FDA was evaluating a new vaccine for use against a new disease, based on a technology—mRNA—that had never before been authorized. Even given the clear sense of urgency, it’s hard to imagine that the review process could have been shortened by more than a week, as happened in the United Kingdom. And even if authorization had been instantaneous, we still don’t know how many doses Pfizer would have had available for distribution by the end of October. Bourla told The Washington Post on September 29 that he expected to have “hundreds of thousands [of doses] ready” in October and “a few million in November”—but production did not ramp up as quickly as expected.

In light of all these facts, the regulatory move probably slowed the rollout by about two to three weeks at most. Without the additional safety requirement, Pfizer could theoretically have stuck with its initial plan and filed for an EUA before the presidential election. Following FDA review, a rollout might have begun in the third week of November.

A quicker process might have kept public confidence in the vaccine depressed for a little while longer, but more than enough people would have still been willing to roll up their sleeve for a jab; after all, it took about four months for vaccine supply to catch up with demand. And with so few doses available for this earlier rollout, they would have had to have been primarily targeted to the most vulnerable: the 1.4 million elderly people in nursing homes, where about 5,000 residents were dying from COVID each week in early December 2020. The vaccines would have cut mortality with the first dose, leading to a steep drop in cases in December, rather than the January decline we saw.

At my request, Claus Kadelka, a mathematician at Iowa State University who has studied COVID-19-vaccination strategies, modeled what would have happened if 2 million bonus doses had been available for nursing homes starting on November 23. Depending on the details of the scenario, he estimated that those extra doses could have saved 6,000 to 10,000 lives.

That doesn’t necessarily mean that the FDA botched its risk-benefit calculus based on what was known at the time, or that the public-health community was out of line in calling for a cautious process. In August and September, when many concerns were raised, COVID case numbers were at a lull, and no one was certain how quickly they would take off again.

And though no major safety events were caught during those extra few weeks of data collection, who’s to say that things couldn’t have worked out otherwise? To argue that the wait was worthless is akin to saying I shouldn’t wear my seat belt tomorrow because I didn’t get in a car accident today. What if a more serious issue had emerged two months after the second dose? It would have harmed not only the uptake of the COVID vaccine (and maybe vaccines for other diseases already on the market), but also the teetering reputation of the FDA. That, too, could have had fatal consequences.

“The truth is that trust in vaccines is critical,” said Peter Marks, the acting head of the agency’s vaccines office, when I reached out to him last week to ask about the claim that the safety delay had cost thousands of lives. “If we didn’t have the data from those extra weeks … we would not have been anywhere near as sure that the vaccines worked—and vaccine hesitancy, which was pretty bad to begin with, would have been even worse.”

The scrutiny of the agency’s shifting goalposts also ignores an important and disturbing fact: An alternative path had been available to the FDA and the vaccine makers all along, one that could have avoided the EUA dilemma while still granting early access to the most vulnerable members of the population.

In October 2020, Deborah Birx, the coordinator of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, was on the ground in North Dakota and alarmed by how quickly COVID was spreading through nursing homes. As I reported in my book, The First Shots, she began to think that the vaccines should be distributed to residents under what’s known as an expanded access, or compassionate use, protocol. This FDA program is typically used by drug companies to provide patients who have rare diseases or cancers with new drugs that are likely safe but have not yet been proved effective in clinical trials. (Prior to the emergency use authorization of convalescent plasma, the Mayo Clinic provided the therapy to more than 70,000 COVID patients via this protocol.)

If a compassionate use program for COVID-19 vaccines had gone forward, doctors would have been able to prescribe them to nursing-home residents, even as the vaccine makers completed their clinical trials with integrity and gathered all the safety data requested under the “EUA Plus” requirements.

According to Marks, Birx asked Anthony Fauci and FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn to encourage Pfizer and Moderna to apply for that program. (Birx declined to comment for this article; Fauci and Hahn did not respond to inquiries.) If the companies had agreed, and if their applications had been granted, how much time could have been gained is hard to say. Such a complex program would have required close monitoring by the CDC and major tweaks to Operation Warp Speed’s vaccine-distribution plans. In any event, conversations around the topic apparently sputtered, and the companies never applied for compassionate use. (Moderna did not reply to a request for comment on this decision. Pfizer responded with a broadly worded statement that read, in part: “We worked closely with the FDA as we developed our vaccine to determine the most appropriate regulatory pathway to make the vaccine available to the public.”)

Perhaps Birx’s efforts would have gathered more steam with a different president, or if an election were not about to happen, or if her proposal had been floated earlier. Unlike in time-travel stories, the course of history rarely pivots on a single event. The actual timing of the COVID-19 vaccines’ release resulted from a complicated mix of bureaucratic caution, political calculations, and the choices made by vaccine manufacturers. While the benefits of the vaccines have become very clear since then, the precise human cost of that short delay remains a mystery.

When you buy a book using a link on this page, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.

US, UK begin talks on lifting Trump's steel tariffs  

The United States and the United Kingdom have agreed to begin talks on removing former President Donald Trump’s import taxes on British steel and aluminum

Trump biographer says family can't 'wriggle out' this time   20%

‘I think there is no chance that Donald Trump didn’t know absolutely everything that was going on’

What comes next in New York's investigation of Donald Trump   8%

New York Attorney General Letitia James is using a court filing to outline much of the evidence her investigators have gathered so far in her yearslong investigation of former President Donald Trump

Supreme court rejects Trump bid to shield documents from January 6 panel  

Court’s move leaves no legal impediment to turning National Archives documents over to congressional committee

The US supreme court has rejected a request by Donald Trump to block the release of White House records to the congressional committee investigating the deadly January 6 attack on the Capitol, dealing a blow to the former president.

The order, which casts aside Trump’s request to stop the House select committee from obtaining the records while the case makes its way through the courts, means more than 700 documents that could shed light on the attack can be transferred to Congress.

Continue reading...

The Guardian view of Joe Biden: he needs to face opponents within and without   -12%

If the president can’t build better he won’t be back. Instead Donald Trump might return

The US president, Joe Biden, suffered his worst day in office – so far – last Thursday. Mr Biden had begun that morning hoping to convince his party to support his push to change Senate rules to pass two voting rights bills. Even before he got a chance to make his case, Senator Kyrsten Sinema, a rightwing Democrat, rejected the president’s plan. At a stroke, two key parts of Mr Biden’s agenda – racial justice and democracy – appear stalled. On the same day, the US supreme court struck down the Biden administration’s requirement for businesses to make employees either be vaccinated against Covid-19 or test weekly and wear a mask at work. The president’s pledge to lift the threat of the pandemic won’t be redeemed any time soon.

Mr Biden’s opponents paint him as a leader of drift and dwindling energy. If this view settles, then it’ll be ​​an image hard to shift. There’s little room for reassessment in politics. That is why the president must change course and have a clear-eyed view of his opponents within and without. The “moderate” wing of the Democratic party has already gutted the president’s climate plans. These Democrats, like most Republicans, depend on a donor class which wants to ​​render legislation inert that would hit corporate profits.

Continue reading...

Attack, attack, attack: Republicans drive to make Biden the bogeyman   26%

The president has had to withstand a barrage from rightwingers – and for Republicans the formula might be working

It seemed that Joe Biden would be bad for business in “Make America great again” world.

In theory, the US president, a white man with working-class roots and moderate policy positions, was a more elusive target for Donald Trump’s increasingly extreme support base than other prominent Democrats.

Continue reading...

What are the Republicans for?': Joe Biden says Trump 'intimidating' entire party video   6%

US president Joe Biden has accused the Republicans of blocking his legislative agenda for purely political purposes, saying the party is more interested in defeating his presidency than doing things for the American people. Without mentioning his name, Biden suggested that former president Donald Trump was still in control of the Republican party, with members of Congress fearful they will be defeated in their primaries if they vote contrary to his wishes. Biden questioned what the purpose of the Republican party was during his a press briefing marking the one-year anniversary of his presidency

Continue reading...

Capitol attack panel grapples with moving inquiry forward: to subpoena or not?  

The committee is undecided on making the near-unprecedented step as the threat of Republican retaliation looms

The House select committee investigating the Capitol attack is weighing whether to subpoena some of Donald Trump’s top allies on Capitol Hill as it considers its options on how aggressively it should pursue testimony to move forward its inquiry into the January 6 insurrection.

The Republican House minority leader, Kevin McCarthy, and Republican members of Congress Jim Jordan and Scott Perry may have inside knowledge about Trump’s plan to stop the certification of Joe Biden’s election and whether it was coordinated with the Capitol attack.

Continue reading...

Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell among Trump allies subpoenaed by January 6 committee   9%

The House committee investigating the US Capitol insurrection have issued subpoenas to Rudy Giuliani and other members of Donald Trump’s legal team who filed bogus legal challenges to the 2020

US Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to keep Capitol attack records secret  

In a setback for former President Donald Trump, the Supreme Court is allowing the release of presidential documents to a congressional committee investigating the 2021 Capitol attack.

US Supreme Court spurns Donald Trumps bid to keep Capitol attack records secret   -5%

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected former president Donald Trump’s request to block the release of White House records sought by the Democratic-led congressional panel investigating last year’s deadly attack on the Capitol by a mob of his supporters.The decision means the documents, held by a federal agency that stores government and historical records, can be disclosed even as litigation over the matter continues in lower courts.Only one of the court’s nine members, conservative…

Investigators found evidence of fraud by Donald Trumps company, New York attorney general says   -6%

The New York attorney general says her investigators have uncovered evidence that former president Donald Trump’s company used “fraudulent or misleading” valuations of its golf clubs, skyscrapers and other property to get loans and tax benefits.In a court filing late Tuesday, lawyers for Attorney General Letitia James told a judge they have not decided whether to bring a lawsuit in connection with the allegations, but that investigators should be allowed to question Trump and his two eldest…

Taiwan has paid US$900,000 for ally Guatemala to lobby US officials  

Guatemala has hired for US$900,000 a major supporter of former president Donald Trump to seek influence with US officials in an unusual lobbying contract paid for by its ally Taiwan, foreign lobby records show.Ballard Partners registered as a foreign agent with the US Justice Department on January 13, according to new filings made public over the weekend. The contract, dated January 12, was signed by Alfonso Quinonez, Guatemala’s ambassador to the US, and Brian Ballard, president of the…

Rudy Giuliani and other pro-Trump lawyers hit with subpoenas over US Capitol attack  

The congressional committee probing the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol issued subpoenas on Tuesday to three lawyers who joined former president Donald Trump’s unsuccessful attempt to overturn his election defeat: Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis.The House of Representatives committee demanded the pro-Trump lawyers hand over documents and sit for depositions on February 8.Congressman Bennie Thompson, the committee’s chairman, said in a statement that the panel expects the…

Joe Biden enters second year of presidency frustrated, looking to fight   -12%

Joe Biden 1.0 was a calming, grandfatherly figure, a low-key veteran coming out of retirement in 2020 to heal a nation deeply divided by Donald Trump. A year later, meet Biden 2.0 – the frustrated, angry fighter.“I’m tired of being quiet,” he said last week in a blistering speech.Biden was referring specifically to his many fruitless “quiet conversations” behind the scenes with senators in a doomed effort to get his signature legislation on voting rights passed. He could just as well have been…

Stolen election belief undimmed for Donald Trump fans. Republicans wish different   -6%

Jonathan Riches has been to 40 Donald Trump rallies and fervently believes the last US presidential election was stolen.Like thousands of others who spent hours in a dusty field in Arizona this weekend to watch the former president speak, that belief is a bedrock – no matter how much the Republican Party leadership wishes otherwise.“We love our president. I call him President Trump because I still consider him my president,” Riches, 44, said.Riches was among fellow believers in Florence, 100km …

White people discriminated against for Covid-19 vaccines, Donald Trump claims   -23%

Donald Trump falsely declared in a weekend rally that US public health authorities are denying the Covid-19 vaccine to white people because of their race.The former president seeded racial resentments in remarks that twisted the facts on public-health policy and exaggerated the effects of racially conscious antiviral treatment guidelines in New York.“The left is now rationing life-saving therapeutics based on race, discriminating against and denigrating … white people to determine who lives and…

Donald Trump calls out gutless politicians who wont say they got coronavirus booster   3%

Former US president Donald Trump is slamming politicians who refuse to say whether they have received Covid-19 booster shots as “gutless”.“You gotta say it. Whether you had it or not, say it,” Trump said in an interview that aired on Tuesday night on the conservative One America News Network.Trump, who was booed last month by supporters after revealing he had received a booster shot, has become increasingly vocal in calling out those who have questioned the vaccines’ efficacy and safety.It’s a…

LISTEN: Why Israels decision to shut out Diaspora Jews will rankle for years  

William Daroff joins Haaretz Weekly to discuss Israeli travel restrictions, and slams Donald Trump over his Mideast peace assertions. Plus, Esther Solomon on why Jews must speak out against abuses in Bosnia

The Israeli painter obsessed with Donald Trump   -70%

Iddo Markus couldn't stop painting Donald Trump. Now he deals with people reacting with anger and disgust to his work

Supreme Court rejects Trumps request to withhold Jan. 6 materials from House committee investigating Capitol riot   -16%

Lawyers for former president Donald Trump had asked the justices to put on hold a unanimous ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which rejected his assertions of executive privilege and his request to keep secret roughly 800 pages of his papers.

4 big points from the N.Y. attorney generals Trump allegations   -10%

Eric Trump and Allen Weisselberg allegedly invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 500 times each, and the lengthy filing details how the alleged schemes can be tied to Donald Trump and his children.

Tracking Bidens environmental actions   60%

President Biden is unwinding Donald Trump’s environmental legacy while forging his own. The Washington Post is chronicling every step.

Trump Organization under fire again as New York AG alleges fraud   -6%

Last year, the Manhattan district attorney charged the Trump Organization with tax fraud. Now Donald Trump’s records are under scrutiny again after the New York attorney general’s office found evidence that his company falsely valued assets for economic gain.

Trump 2024? Some supporters quietly hope he wont run.   24%

Although Republican voters strongly approve of Donald Trump, some fans would prefer a fresh face to pick up the former president’s mantle.

Biden not there yet on easing tariffs on Chinese goods  

US president says China not meeting commitments under a Phase 1 trade deal signed by his predecessor Donald Trump.

Trump Organization accused of fraud   5%

NY Attorney General Letitia James asked a court to compel Donald Trump, son Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka to cooperate over fraud accusations.
Read Full Article at

Ex-Trump official asked how to get through to 'big lie' believers. Hear his answer  

Brianna Keilar speaks to Chris Krebs, a cybersecurity official under former President Donald Trump, about whether it's possible to get through to people who remain convinced that the 2020 election was stolen.

Congressional subpoena for Giuliani seeks info on his meetings, fees and fraud claims  

Congressional investigators are demanding information from former President Donald Trump's onetime lawyer Rudy Giuliani about contacts with members of Congress and state election officials, his fee arrangements and any evidence to back up bogus and sometimes outlandish claims of voter fraud.

U.S. Supreme Court allows release of Trump documents to Jan. 6 panel  

In a rebuff to former U.S. president Donald Trump, the U.S. Supreme Court is allowing the release of presidential documents sought by the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Potential fraudulent acts by Donald Trump, his company revealed in court documents   -8%

The New York attorney general's office late Tuesday told a court its investigators had uncovered evidence that former president Donald Trump's company used "fraudulent or misleading" asset valuations to get loans and tax benefits.

Rudy Giuliani, other Trump allies subpoenaed by U.S. House panel investigating Jan. 6  

The U.S. House of Representatives committee investigating the Capitol insurrection issued a new batch of subpoenas Tuesday to some of Donald Trump's closest advisers, including Rudy Giuliani, as the committee inches closer to the former president.

GOP takes a potent but risky new path: Hitting Biden on Covid   -12%

Republicans are betting — despite Donald Trump's past pandemic stumbles — that spiking cases and public exhaustion can help their case against the president.

Hyperbole or Fraud? The Question at the Heart of Trump Investigation.   5%

The New York attorney general has cited more than a dozen instances in which she said Donald J. Trump inflated the value of his assets, including his Trump Tower penthouse.

N.Y. Attorney General Outlines Pattern of Possible Fraud at Trump Business   5%

The attorney general, Letitia James, released new details of her investigation as she argued for the need to question Donald J. Trump and two of his children under oath.

Trump Ends NPR Interview After Challenges to False Fraud Claim   -6%

Former President Donald J. Trump abruptly ended the interview after a lengthy back-and-forth over his claims of widespread election fraud.

US Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to keep Capitol siege records secret   -5%

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected former President Donald Trump's request to block the release of White House records sought by the Democratic-led congressional panel investigating last year's deadly attack on the Capitol by a mob of his supporters.